From 9f35776afc6ca97953cb79b7732c4578f7665abc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: CaptainJack2491 Date: Sat, 2 May 2026 20:44:22 +0100 Subject: docs: added objectives in the intro --- docs/final/intro.typ | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) (limited to 'docs/final/intro.typ') diff --git a/docs/final/intro.typ b/docs/final/intro.typ index b7a885d..5b433f6 100644 --- a/docs/final/intro.typ +++ b/docs/final/intro.typ @@ -31,6 +31,23 @@ This dissertation addresses the following research questions: 3. *The Stealth Gap:* Does increased oversight reduce deceptive intent, or does it primarily drive models to conceal deceptive behavior more effectively from output-level evaluation? 4. *Evaluation Triangulation:* Can a multi-pronged evaluation approach (deterministic filtering, output-level judgment, and reasoning-level judgment) provide consistent and robust categorizations of deceptive intent? +== Objectives + +Objectives I proposed in my \@proposal: +// TODO: add proposal link in apendix + ++ To research existing work on deceptive alignment and agentic misbehaviour. ++ To build a lightweight sandbox environment that lets the agent interact with a simulated file system via constrained functions. ++ To Create two task: + - a benign “cover task”: the stated, official goal. + - a “hidden goal”: a secret directive injected into its system prompt. ++ To Develop a controlled experiments that varies the agent’s perceived level of oversight through different system prompts. ++ To Conduct qualitative experiments on 4-5 LLM models, running multiple trails for each condition, ensuring log data is structured for potential quantitative analysis. ++ To Analyze the behaviour logs and identify evidence of: + - deceptive or evasive tactics, + - situational reasoning or ethical reasoning, + - difference in conduct across oversight levels ++ To Reflect on the implications of these behaviours for design and deployment of autonomous systems. == Contributions This dissertation contributes: -- cgit v1.2.3