Robustness confirmed: freq correlation identical under Anthropic's exact estimator (skip16+source_mean), max delta 0.008 all layers

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md b/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
index 4b2b429..34ce5fa 100644
--- a/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
+++ b/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
@@ -131,8 +131,9 @@ mathematically equivalent (verified by the identity check above). Their
 estimator has two differences of detail: it excludes the first 16 positions
 (attention sinks) and the last position from the average, and it averages over
 source positions rather than (source, future) pairs. We re-ran our analysis
-with their exact estimator choices to confirm the correlation is robust to
-those choices — see Section 6.)
+with their exact estimator choices: the frequency correlation is essentially
+identical at every layer (max delta 0.008, see results.md section 1b), so the
+result is robust to those choices.)
 
 (One technical note: we capture the residual stream *before* the model's final
 layer norm. That matches the paper's definition — the Jacobian stops at the