1 files changed, 0 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/reviews/2026-07-31-claude-opus-4.6.md b/reviews/2026-07-31-claude-opus-4.6.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 2ff8227..0000000
--- a/reviews/2026-07-31-claude-opus-4.6.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# Review: Claude Opus 4.6 (agy, 2026-07-31)
-
-Adversarial review of the J-space replication project. Full brief: /tmp/jspace_brief.md.
-
-## Headline
-
-**The implementation computes the wrong quantity.**
-
-Anthropic's J-lens vectors are rows of `W_U · E[∂h_final/∂h_ℓ]` — the Jacobian stops at
-the final *residual stream*, before softmax. Our code (jlens_v2.py) differentiates through
-`log_softmax`, which folds in a `(1 − p(k))` factor that mechanically anticorrelates norm
-with frequency. The r = −0.65 may be an artefact of this difference, not a property of the
-model's representations.
-
-## Q1
-
-The 67% causal drop and the min(V,d) rank law both follow from the softmax gradient
-mechanics and linear algebra respectively — neither requires a "workspace" explanation.
-The causal experiment doesn't control for the softmax saturation confound.
-
-## Q2
-
-The cheapest kill-or-save experiment: compute J-lens BOTH ways (our `∇ log p` vs
-Anthropic-faithful `∇ h_final` composed with `W_U`) on the *existing* trained model.
-If the correlation vanishes with the faithful method, the thesis is dead.
-~30 min of compute, zero retraining.
-
-## Q3
-
-gpt2_jlens.py also has a norm-averaging bug: it accumulates `E[‖∇‖]` (average of norms)
-rather than `‖E[∇]‖` (norm of average), which are different quantities by Jensen's
-inequality.
-
-## Q4
-
-Frame as "open confounds to control," not "refutation." We haven't faithfully replicated
-their method, and we haven't addressed any of their functional experiments (steering,
-verbal report, reasoning ablation).