index
:
prime-grokking.git
main
Prime Grokking — can minimal architectures grok next-prime? Pre-registered negative-class experiment (weight-tied RNN vs transformer).
summary
refs
log
tree
commit
diff
log msg
author
committer
range
path:
root
/
jobs
Age
Commit message (
Collapse
)
Author
25 hours
E8 launch order: armB (longest) first, then A/C/D1/D2/D3
HEAD
main
Void Agent
48 hours
optimize E8: precompute causal mask buffer, add eval early exit, and enable ↵
CaptainJack2491
compile_model in e8.csv
48 hours
implement Addendum 8: 6-arm token-space recurrence suite (arms A, B, C, D1, ↵
CaptainJack2491
D2, D3), tests, and jobs/e8.csv
7 days
E7 relaunch order: GPU cell first, completed tf-wd01 cell last (idempotent skip)
Void Agent
11 days
E7 jobs: 4M-step long-horizon, mixed-device (rnn->cpu, ↵
Void Agent
transformer->cuda+compile)
2026-08-17
E6 jobs: 16 cells [2,1000] K=32 cuda AMP (14 primary + 2 batch-128 ↵
Void Agent
ablation); Addendum 6 locked 61b002f
2026-08-16
phase3: task_mode (is_prime), train_frac, lr_decay flags + tests (41 green); ↵
Void Agent
Addendum 5 locked; 11-job batch
2026-08-15
E2 wd sweep: 8 jobs (0.01/0.1/0.3/3.0 x both models, seed 0; 1.0 = existing ↵
Void Agent
control)
2026-08-15
speedup: batched eval (46x, sieve-stub verified), run_sweep orchestrator ↵
Void Agent
(2-way parallel, idempotent, summaries), E1 jobs; 36 tests