Short version: clean-boundary control is resolved (~1.3x), not pendingmain

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md b/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
index 8ab2e46..0d51c8d 100644
--- a/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
+++ b/docs/blog-jlens-frequency.md
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ into two separable parts. Half lives in the static geometry of the model's
 word-scoring matrix — baked into the lens by definition, so any user inherits
 it. A smaller, layer-dependent part lives in what the layers themselves do, and
 vanishes at the final layer. A frequency-matched synthetic pair shows the lens
-also carries genuine structure signal (with a caveat we're resolving), and a
-causal test found the demotion effect is small under loss reweighting. We are
-**not** claiming the J-space doesn't exist. We're claiming that any
-"privileged subspace" interpretation needs a frequency control first. The full
-story — numbers, mistakes, and all — is below.
+also carries genuine structure signal (confirmed by a clean-boundary control at
+~1.3x), and a causal test found the demotion effect is small under loss
+reweighting. We are **not** claiming the J-space doesn't exist. We're claiming
+that any "privileged subspace" interpretation needs a frequency control first.
+The full story — numbers, mistakes, and all — is below.
 
 ---